LFD Book Forum  

Go Back   LFD Book Forum > Book Feedback - Learning From Data > Chapter 2 - Training versus Testing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2016, 06:42 PM
Sangrock Lee Sangrock Lee is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 6
Default problem 2.14-(b)

Hi,

From the given formula, I can derive d_vc<l, but I don't know how to make this d_vc <= l. Can anyone give me a clue on it?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2016, 07:06 PM
Haoming Haoming is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 1
Default Re: problem 2.14-(b)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sangrock Lee View Post
Hi,

From the given formula, I can derive d_vc<l, but I don't know how to make this d_vc <= l. Can anyone give me a clue on it?

Thanks.
I have the same issue as yours.

The way I approach this problem is that, since exp(l) > poly(l), l must be greater than break point. But I have a strong feeling that this is not the right way to do it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-04-2016, 05:29 PM
Wennan Wennan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1
Default Re: problem 2.14-(b)

I also get d_vc < l. Actually d_vc < l implies d_vc <= l. So it works if we get that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sangrock Lee View Post
Hi,

From the given formula, I can derive d_vc<l, but I don't know how to make this d_vc <= l. Can anyone give me a clue on it?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2016, 12:11 PM
dubwub dubwub is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 2
Default Re: problem 2.14-(b)

How did you prove that d_VC(H) < l? I've proved that d_VC < l but I'm having difficulty expanding it to the entire union hypothesis set.

EDIT: Oh just kidding, figured it out, part a is helpful
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-27-2016, 01:56 AM
williamshakespare williamshakespare is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 6
Default Re: problem 2.14-(b)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dubwub View Post
How did you prove that d_VC(H) < l? I've proved that d_VC < l but I'm having difficulty expanding it to the entire union hypothesis set.

EDIT: Oh just kidding, figured it out, part a is helpful
how do you induce dvc(H) < l? I still can't make it.
Thanks a lot
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-27-2016, 02:10 AM
williamshakespare williamshakespare is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 6
Default Re: problem 2.14-(b)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dubwub View Post
How did you prove that d_VC(H) < l? I've proved that d_VC < l but I'm having difficulty expanding it to the entire union hypothesis set.

EDIT: Oh just kidding, figured it out, part a is helpful
how do you induce dvc(H) < l? I still can't make it.
Thanks a lot
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are to be used ONLY by readers of the Learning From Data book by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa, Malik Magdon-Ismail, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, and participants in the Learning From Data MOOC by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa. No part of these contents is to be communicated or made accessible to ANY other person or entity.