LFD Book Forum  

Go Back   LFD Book Forum > Book Feedback - Learning From Data > Chapter 2 - Training versus Testing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-29-2016, 07:36 PM
ScientistGirl ScientistGirl is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2
Question Exercise 2.2 - Requesting Clarification

Exercise 2.2 asks to verify the bound of Theorem 2.4 in the three cases of Example 2.2

However,

on (i) it mentions h(x) = sign (x - alpha)

This made me confuse.

The whole question is not clear to me.


Would anyone help? Any tip or reply is appreciated!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2016, 03:09 AM
MaciekLeks MaciekLeks is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Katowice, Upper Silesia, Poland
Posts: 17
Default Re: Exercise 2.2 - Requesting Clarification

IMHO, there is no need to use the formula h(x)=sign(x-a) (it's just a formula for postive rays) to verify theorem 2.4 because the inequality depends not on a hypothesis but on the growth function.

It's enough to show that the LHS and RHS of the theorem inequality holds. You know growth functions for all the cases.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are to be used ONLY by readers of the Learning From Data book by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa, Malik Magdon-Ismail, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, and participants in the Learning From Data MOOC by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa. No part of these contents is to be communicated or made accessible to ANY other person or entity.