LFD Book Forum  

Go Back   LFD Book Forum > Book Feedback - Learning From Data > Chapter 1 - The Learning Problem

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-22-2015, 02:46 AM
LambdaX LambdaX is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 2
Default Exercise 1.10

I'm confused as to what part c of Exercise 1.10 is asking. What does it mean by the following?

HTML Code:
"plot estimates for P[|ν-μ| > ε] as a function of ε, together with the Hoeffding bound 2e<sup>-2ε<sup>2</sup>N</sup> (on the same graph)."
HTML Code:
Does this mean to plot P[|ν-μ| > ε] and 2e<sup>-2ε<sup>2</sup>N</sup> each as a separate graph? I can plot  2e<sup>-2ε<sup>2</sup>N</sup> as a function of ε easily, but how would I go about plotting P[|ν-μ| > ε]? Would I define a function that plots the likelihood that |ν-μ| > ε based on the input ε, using the data obtained in part b? Am I on the right track with this thinking?
HTML Code:
Also, is the book asking to plot a separate graph for each graph in b (i.e. ν<sub>1</sub>, ν<sub>rand</sub>, and ν<sub>min</sub>), based on the distribution of ν for each?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-22-2015, 02:56 AM
LambdaX LambdaX is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 2
Default Re: Exercise 1.10

I apologize for the previous format. I can't seem to find a way to edit or delete the thread. Here's a more readable version.

What does it mean by the following?

"plot estimates for P[|ν-μ| > ε] as a function of ε, together with the Hoeffding bound 2e^(-2(ε^2)N) (on the same graph)."

Does this mean to plot P[|ν-μ| > ε] and 2e^(-2(ε^2)N) each as a separate graph? I can plot 2e^(-2(ε^2)N) as a function of ε easily, but how would I go about plotting P[|ν-μ| > ε]? Would I define a function that plots the likelihood that |ν-μ| > ε based on the input ε, using the data obtained in part b? Am I on the right track with this thinking?

Also, is the book asking to plot a separate graph for each graph in b (i.e. ν_1 ν_rand, and ν_min), based on the distribution of ν for each?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-24-2015, 01:35 PM
magdon's Avatar
magdon magdon is offline
RPI
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Troy, NY, USA.
Posts: 595
Default Re: Exercise 1.10

The problem asks you to compute P[|ν-μ| > ε] from your data for ε equal to (say) 0,0.01,0.02,0.03,....0.5
Now plot this computed probability for each value of epsilon versus epsilon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LambdaX View Post
I apologize for the previous format. I can't seem to find a way to edit or delete the thread. Here's a more readable version.

What does it mean by the following?

"plot estimates for P[|ν-μ| > ε] as a function of ε, together with the Hoeffding bound 2e^(-2(ε^2)N) (on the same graph)."

Does this mean to plot P[|ν-μ| > ε] and 2e^(-2(ε^2)N) each as a separate graph? I can plot 2e^(-2(ε^2)N) as a function of ε easily, but how would I go about plotting P[|ν-μ| > ε]? Would I define a function that plots the likelihood that |ν-μ| > ε based on the input ε, using the data obtained in part b? Am I on the right track with this thinking?

Also, is the book asking to plot a separate graph for each graph in b (i.e. ν_1 ν_rand, and ν_min), based on the distribution of ν for each?
__________________
Have faith in probability
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
chapter 1, exercise 1.10, hoeffding

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are to be used ONLY by readers of the Learning From Data book by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa, Malik Magdon-Ismail, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, and participants in the Learning From Data MOOC by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa. No part of these contents is to be communicated or made accessible to ANY other person or entity.