LFD Book Forum  

Go Back   LFD Book Forum > Course Discussions > Online LFD course > Homework 3

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2013, 09:38 PM
jlaurentum jlaurentum is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Venezuela
Posts: 41
Default Positive rays, Positive Intervals, Convex sets and the growth function

Hello,

From what I understood in lecture 5 as the discussion progresses from positive rays to positive intervals to convex sets, the idea is to put an upper bound on all possible dichotomies. As convex sets, with an upper bound of 2^N on the growth function, are the most general scenario possible, then this is the upperbound on the growth function for perceptrons, which fall somewhere in between the positive ray- positive interval-convex sets continuum. Is my understanding correct?

Due to the political unrest in my country (Venezuela), I've not been able to get started with lecture 6 at this time, so I don't know if what I'm about to ask is addressed later on.

I imagine rotating a perceptron to the point where the boundary line is horizontal and all points fall above or bellow this boundary line:



If this is possible (the rotation), then wouldn't the growth function for linearly separable data with perceptrons be limited to N+1, as in the case of positive rays?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2013, 10:33 PM
yaser's Avatar
yaser yaser is offline
Caltech
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena, California, USA
Posts: 1,477
Default Re: Positive rays, Positive Intervals, Convex sets and the growth function

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlaurentum View Post
Hello,

From what I understood in lecture 5 as the discussion progresses from positive rays to positive intervals to convex sets, the idea is to put an upper bound on all possible dichotomies. As convex sets, with an upper bound of 2^N on the growth function, are the most general scenario possible, then this is the upperbound on the growth function for perceptrons, which fall somewhere in between the positive ray- positive interval-convex sets continuum. Is my understanding correct?

Due to the political unrest in my country (Venezuela), I've not been able to get started with lecture 6 at this time, so I don't know if what I'm about to ask is addressed later on.

I imagine rotating a perceptron to the point where the boundary line is horizontal and all points fall above or bellow this boundary line:



If this is possible (the rotation), then wouldn't the growth function for linearly separable data with perceptrons be limited to N+1, as in the case of positive rays?
The points on which to generate dichotomies are arbitrary but fixed. When you rotate the plane, the points are no longer fixed, but move with every new hypothesis, so it is not the same notion.

Stay safe.
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are to be used ONLY by readers of the Learning From Data book by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa, Malik Magdon-Ismail, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, and participants in the Learning From Data MOOC by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa. No part of these contents is to be communicated or made accessible to ANY other person or entity.