![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Please comment on the chapter problems in terms of difficulty, clarity, and time demands. This information will help us and other instructors in choosing problems to assign in our classes.
Also, please comment on the exercises in terms of how useful they are in understanding the material.
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I won't "mathify" this correction, as I don't know how in this forum (my LaTex has escaped me after years of neglect!). It's a minor point, but I feel like it should be corrected. In the wording for Exercise 2.1 on page 45:
ERROR: "Verify that m_H(n) < 2^k" CORRECTION: "Verify that m_H(k) < 2^k" Thanks! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The problem says that in case of perceptron in d-dimensional space, growth function is equal to B(N,k). Consider the following case :
d = 2, implies dvc = 2+1 = 3 N = 4 B(N,k) = 15 but the maximum no. of dichotomies possible in this case is only 14 Can someone please comment if i am missing something. Thanks. Vishwajeet. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for catching this erratum. The problem shows the upper bound based on the VC dimension. The actual growth function is given by:
![]() Our appologies. Quote:
__________________
Have faith in probability |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry for the delayed response here, but i still find that
![]() is not the case for a perceptron in d-dimensional space. When N=6 and d=2, this equation says ![]() If i am missing something, then can you please point me to the proof. Thank you. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To prove :
![]() As this is a generic statement, it has to apply to every growth function. But all we know about the growth functions (in general) is their bound, in terms of ![]() ![]() Also, we know that if ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I guess my question is that how can we prove the generic statement above. Kindly shed some light on the proof strategy. Thank you, Vishwajeet. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The problem, though an over-estimate seems correct.
Hint: If you have ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Have faith in probability |
![]() |
Tags |
errata, growth function, perceptron |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|