LFD Book Forum Clarification on finding a break point

#1
04-22-2012, 03:56 PM
 TomKetola Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 5
Clarification on finding a break point

I watched the lectures and went through the book, but I had some questions with my understanding after working on the homework exercises. I seem to be lost in somewhat of a circular argument. My understanding is that if k is a breakpoint, then m_H(n) < 2^k. I can find B(n, k), which if k is a breakpoint for H, m_H(n) < B(n, k). I think I follow the logic of the proofs and bounding, where if we can prove that B(n, k) is bounded by a polynomial, then clearly values smaller than B(n, k) are also bounded by polynomials. What I thought I had seen/heard when I was reading the text book and watching the lectures was a formula for discovering m_H(n) without using pure inspection, but now I can't seem to find it. Is there a formula for discovering m_H(n), or is it found only by inspection? If so, can someone point me to where this is discussed?
#2
04-22-2012, 06:47 PM
 yaser Caltech Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Pasadena, California, USA Posts: 1,477
Re: Clarification on finding a break point

Quote:
 Originally Posted by TomKetola I watched the lectures and went through the book, but I had some questions with my understanding after working on the homework exercises. I seem to be lost in somewhat of a circular argument. My understanding is that if k is a breakpoint, then m_H(n) < 2^k. I can find B(n, k), which if k is a breakpoint for H, m_H(n) < B(n, k). I think I follow the logic of the proofs and bounding, where if we can prove that B(n, k) is bounded by a polynomial, then clearly values smaller than B(n, k) are also bounded by polynomials. What I thought I had seen/heard when I was reading the text book and watching the lectures was a formula for discovering m_H(n) without using pure inspection, but now I can't seem to find it. Is there a formula for discovering m_H(n), or is it found only by inspection? If so, can someone point me to where this is discussed?
There is a formula for an upper bound on the growth function, based on a break point . The exact evaluation of a growth function is a case-by-case exercise, and a difficult one in many cases. Fortunately, it's not needed since the upper bound achieves the probability bound that we need in the VC inequality.

The bound comes from the bound on (which in turn bounds the growth function), and it is the formula given in class:

__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home General     General Discussion of Machine Learning     Free Additional Material         Dynamic e-Chapters         Dynamic e-Appendices Course Discussions     Online LFD course         General comments on the course         Homework 1         Homework 2         Homework 3         Homework 4         Homework 5         Homework 6         Homework 7         Homework 8         The Final         Create New Homework Problems Book Feedback - Learning From Data     General comments on the book     Chapter 1 - The Learning Problem     Chapter 2 - Training versus Testing     Chapter 3 - The Linear Model     Chapter 4 - Overfitting     Chapter 5 - Three Learning Principles     e-Chapter 6 - Similarity Based Methods     e-Chapter 7 - Neural Networks     e-Chapter 8 - Support Vector Machines     e-Chapter 9 - Learning Aides     Appendix and Notation     e-Appendices

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:52 PM.