LFD Book Forum  

Go Back   LFD Book Forum > Book Feedback - Learning From Data > Appendix and Notation

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25  
Old 10-26-2016, 03:28 PM
CountVonCount CountVonCount is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 17
Default Re: Discussion of the VC proof

I have also another question on the same page (190):
At the end of the page there is the formula:



I don't understand why the RHS is greater or equal to the LHS. The only legitimation I see for this is, that the distribution of P[S] is uniform, but this has not been stated in the text.
Or do I oversee here anything and this is also valid for all kinds of distribution?
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are to be used ONLY by readers of the Learning From Data book by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa, Malik Magdon-Ismail, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, and participants in the Learning From Data MOOC by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa. No part of these contents is to be communicated or made accessible to ANY other person or entity.