![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 31 minutes mark professor has assumed that the input samples come from a probability distribution. My question is why do we make this assumption? Because throughout the lecture we haven't make use of this assumption anywhere.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The assumption made it possible to invoke Hoeffding inequality. Without a probability distribution, one cannot talk about the probability of an event (the left-hand-side of the inequality). The specifics of the probability distribution don't matter here, any distribution will do.
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can't I start talking about hypothesis analogy without making this assumption?
I mean if i say that a hypothesis is analogous to a bin and then I say that for any hypothesis there is a probability that that it will make a wrong classification in the bin and in the sample with probability \mu & \vu. And then go ahead with hooeffding's inequality. In doing so do I really need that assumption? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much |
![]() |
Tags |
is learning feasible? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|