LFD Book Forum P(X) and Error Measure Doubts in Lecture 4
 Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

#1
07-24-2012, 02:09 AM
 pranav_s Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 4
P(X) and Error Measure Doubts in Lecture 4

I have a couple of doubts from the 4th Lecture, any clarification would be really appreciated.

1. When talking about P(X), I gather that it was introduced in order to arrive at the Hoeffding's Inequality which is probabilistic in nature. However, even if whe are not making any assumptions about P(X), isn't it true that we are limiting the generalization prospects. As in, if we assume the input set having a particular P(X) we are really regarding the inputs distributed only along those lines. Please clarify if I have got it all wrong!

2.Error measures are supposed to be the average point-wise errors encountered using a hypothesis. How do we really calculate the E_out. considering we do not know the target function, we have taken a random out of sample input. So, e(h(X),f(X)) seems strange as f(X) is really unknown at this Input point.
#2
07-24-2012, 02:34 AM
 yaser Caltech Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Pasadena, California, USA Posts: 1,478
Re: P(X) and Error Measure Doubts in Lecture 4

Quote:
 Originally Posted by pranav_s 1. When talking about P(X), I gather that it was introduced in order to arrive at the Hoeffding's Inequality which is probabilistic in nature. However, even if whe are not making any assumptions about P(X), isn't it true that we are limiting the generalization prospects. As in, if we assume the input set having a particular P(X) we are really regarding the inputs distributed only along those lines. Please clarify if I have got it all wrong!
Your understanding of the role of is correct. The problem you foresee if we take a particular is not really a problem since we do not need to pick a particular . No points are emphasized or deemphasized by the assumption we made which is the mere existence of such .

Quote:
 2.Error measures are supposed to be the average point-wise errors encountered using a hypothesis. How do we really calculate the E_out. considering we do not know the target function, we have taken a random out of sample input. So, e(h(X),f(X)) seems strange as f(X) is really unknown at this Input point.
The out-of-sample error is inherently unknown. If it were known, we would just minimize it and forget about learning from the data set. However, there are ways to estimate the out-of-sample error through a test or validation set. This will be discussed in detail in a later lecture.
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much
#3
07-24-2012, 09:22 AM
 pranav_s Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 4
Re: P(X) and Error Measure Doubts in Lecture 4

Thank you sir, also the course is really interesting.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home General     General Discussion of Machine Learning     Free Additional Material         Dynamic e-Chapters         Dynamic e-Appendices Course Discussions     Online LFD course         General comments on the course         Homework 1         Homework 2         Homework 3         Homework 4         Homework 5         Homework 6         Homework 7         Homework 8         The Final         Create New Homework Problems Book Feedback - Learning From Data     General comments on the book     Chapter 1 - The Learning Problem     Chapter 2 - Training versus Testing     Chapter 3 - The Linear Model     Chapter 4 - Overfitting     Chapter 5 - Three Learning Principles     e-Chapter 6 - Similarity Based Methods     e-Chapter 7 - Neural Networks     e-Chapter 8 - Support Vector Machines     e-Chapter 9 - Learning Aides     Appendix and Notation     e-Appendices

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:10 AM.