LFD Book Forum P(x) vs. P(y |x)
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

 Thread Tools Display Modes
#1
06-06-2016, 04:00 AM
 pouramini Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Posts: 16
P(x) vs. P(y |x)

The book says:

Quote:
 While both distributions model probabilistic aspects of x and y, the target distribution P(y | x) is what we are trying to learn, while the input distribution P(x) only quantifies the relative importance of the point x in gauging how well we have learned.
I didn't get it! what is actually the difference? and specially the usage of P(x).. My English is not well!

Does it mean P(x) is only used in creating training and test set? and it is used in the estimate provided by test set of E_out?
#2
06-06-2016, 05:35 AM
 henry2015 Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Posts: 31
Re: P(x) vs. P(y |x)

P(x) = probability of x
P(y|x) = probability of y given x has happened already
#3
06-06-2016, 09:16 AM
 pouramini Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Posts: 16
Re: P(x) vs. P(y |x)

Quote:
 Originally Posted by henry2015 P(x) = probability of x P(y|x) = probability of y given x has happened already
I know, but what they mean in learning! does my conclusion in the initial post correct?
#4
06-06-2016, 09:20 PM
 henry2015 Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Posts: 31
Re: P(x) vs. P(y |x)

My understanding is that the text you quoted is talking about learning when the target function has noise.

Because the target function has noise, so given an input x, f(x) doesn't always give y.

Hence, in this case, if we want to apply machine learning, we want to conclude what the probability of y given x as the input -- i.e. P(y|x).

Hence, P(x) isn't used for creating training set. P(x) is just talking about the distribution of x.

"P(x) only quantifies the relative importance of the point x in gauging how well we have learned"

For instance, if P(x1) is very small, we can't say that we learn very very well when P(y1|x1) is close to 1. Because there are x2, x3, ... that they might appear more frequent than x1 (e.g. P(x2) is much greater than P(x1)). When P(y1|x1) is close to 1, we can only say that we learn very well about how x1 is used to predict y1. But we can't say anything about x2, x3....given P(x1) is relatively small.

Hope I don't confuse you more.

If any of my statement is flaw, I appreciate anyone's correction
#5
06-08-2016, 12:34 PM
 pouramini Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Posts: 16
Re: P(x) vs. P(y |x)

Thank you! however I still need the author or another one clarify the sentence more... when he says "gauging how well we learned", I think he speaks about the test set.

We also know that we should avoid sampling bias. Then in my opinion P(x) is used in training set to make it unbiased, not?

and we know any distribution we used in training set we should use in test set, then P(x) is used in the test set too.

However I still don't know if we know P(x) or not, is it known?!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home General     General Discussion of Machine Learning     Free Additional Material         Dynamic e-Chapters         Dynamic e-Appendices Course Discussions     Online LFD course         General comments on the course         Homework 1         Homework 2         Homework 3         Homework 4         Homework 5         Homework 6         Homework 7         Homework 8         The Final         Create New Homework Problems Book Feedback - Learning From Data     General comments on the book     Chapter 1 - The Learning Problem     Chapter 2 - Training versus Testing     Chapter 3 - The Linear Model     Chapter 4 - Overfitting     Chapter 5 - Three Learning Principles     e-Chapter 6 - Similarity Based Methods     e-Chapter 7 - Neural Networks     e-Chapter 8 - Support Vector Machines     e-Chapter 9 - Learning Aides     Appendix and Notation     e-Appendices

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:36 PM.

 Contact Us - LFD Book - Top