![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
||w(t)||^2
= ||w(t-1) + y(t-1)x(t-1)||^2 <--- this is from the PLA iteration <=(||w(t-1)|| + ||y(t-1)x(t-1)||)^2 <--- a property: ||a + b|| <= ||a|| + ||b|| = ||w(t-1)||^2 + 2y(t-1)||w(t-1)||||x(t-1)|| + y(t-1)^2||x(t-1)||^2 = ||w(t-1)||^2 + 2y(t-1)||w(t-1)||||x(t-1)|| + ||x(t-1)||^2 Now, it seems like 2y(t-1)||w(t-1)||||x(t-1)|| is somehow <= 0. ||w(t-1)||||x(t-1)|| is >= 0 tho. hence, it seems like 2y(t-1) is somehow <= 0. It seems like I am on the wrong track as I am not using the hint mentioned in the question at all. Any pointer? Thanks! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This inequality ||a + b|| <= ||a|| + ||b|| is quite loose in general and you may want to consider not using it. Hope this helps.
__________________
When one teaches, two learn. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I just revisited this problem again. If I substitute w(t-1) with ![]() x(t-1) with ![]() I could get ![]() ![]() ![]() and then use the hint to get the answer. However, the dimension of x and w can be more than 3. I just wonder whether there is a more generic proof. Thanks in advance. Last edited by henry2015; 06-10-2016 at 03:38 AM. Reason: syntax error |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|