LFD Book Forum  

Go Back   LFD Book Forum > Course Discussions > Online LFD course > Homework 6

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2013, 01:01 AM
doneit doneit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 15
Default HW6-Q1 ambiguous/contradictory

I've checked my understanding of set-notation but am I correct in thinking the question says "H' is-a-subset of H", ie, less complex?

To me the most "general" case is having a large, possibly infinite, H where the bulk would be overly complex. So my (wrong) answer assumes that by reducing complexity of the set I'm reducing the chance of over-fitting. So "in general" I'm *reducing* the chance of deterministic noise. Of course after a certain point it will increase again, limited by a flat lined solution.

So why would assuming H is already less complex be more "general" that this? Additionally, pg 124 states over-fitting increases with complexity. I scratch my head to the point of baldness

Btw, I'm enjoying the video lectures immensely. It's like watch a soap opera with twists & turns, plots & sub-plots, and just when the situation seems impossible the magician doffs his top hat and pulls out another white rabbit I actually giggled at the cross-validation trick
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-18-2013, 01:12 AM
yaser's Avatar
yaser yaser is offline
Caltech
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena, California, USA
Posts: 1,476
Default Re: HW6-Q1 ambiguous/contradictory

Quote:
Originally Posted by doneit View Post
I've checked my understanding of set-notation but am I correct in thinking the question says "H' is-a-subset of H", ie, less complex?

To me the most "general" case is having a large, possibly infinite, H where the bulk would be overly complex. So my (wrong) answer assumes that by reducing complexity of the set I'm reducing the chance of over-fitting. So "in general" I'm *reducing* the chance of deterministic noise.
Your understanding is correct in that a subset will be generally less complex than the original set. I think the source of confusion is that overfitting is affected by both the level of noise and the complexity of the model, and for deterministic noise the complexity in turn affects the level of noise. The question, however, addresses deterministic noise only, not necessarily the overfitting effect that results from it. The part which is not accurate in the above quote is the last sentence that mixes the two.

Quote:
Btw, I'm enjoying the video lectures immensely. It's like watch a soap opera with twists & turns, plots & sub-plots, and just when the situation seems impossible the magician doffs his top hat and pulls out another white rabbit I actually giggled at the cross-validation trick
If I had thought of that, I would have inserted some commercial breaks at the right moments.
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2013, 01:46 AM
doneit doneit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 15
Default Re: HW6-Q1 ambiguous/contradictory

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaser View Post
The part which is not accurate in the above quote is the last sentence that mixes the two.
Ok, got it, thanks.

Quote:
If I had thought of that, I would have inserted some commercial breaks at the right moments.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
complexity, overfitting

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are to be used ONLY by readers of the Learning From Data book by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa, Malik Magdon-Ismail, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, and participants in the Learning From Data MOOC by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa. No part of these contents is to be communicated or made accessible to ANY other person or entity.