![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the range of a? [-1,1] of [-INF, +INF] ?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From my testing, a is within +/- pi.
This follows from the max/min gradient of sin(pi.x) = pi . cos(pi . x) It is ok to use a larger range, just that the program will run slower. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, but now I think I've hit another snag. Is the bias in class surely 0.21? My calculation shows it as exactly 0.31...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't help with that but I have a more basic question. To get ax on two points, do we take the "a" based on the average of the two points
(y1+y2)/(x1+x2) -or- calculate "a" on each point and take the average? 1/2 (y1/x1 + y2/x2) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The two give very different results, but shouldn't they be equivalent in grading?
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think (y1+y2)/(x1+x2) is valid, i.e., not the best choice for the line a*x. Maybe 1/2*(y1/x1 + y2/x2) is close but is it correct?
Seems like the way to go is to get a formula for the distance function (squared distance) and then minimize it. The answer from that process differs from 1/2*(y1/x1 + y2/x2). EDIT: Prof. Mostafa posted while I was checking that result. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Lecture 8 slide 15, for y=ax+b, g_bar passes through the origin even though it is not forced to. This is reasonable due to the 'symmetry' of the curve.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|