LFD Book Forum  

Go Back   LFD Book Forum > Course Discussions > Online LFD course > Homework 1

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-07-2012, 12:09 PM
ArikB ArikB is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 8
Default Confused on question 6.

Edit: Solved it, the story below is no longer relevant.

I'm confused about how one is supposed to calculate the score exactly. My biggest confusion seems to stem from the misunderstanding of what a 'point' is. Is a point one of the input vectors? so 101, 110 and 111 are 3 points?

So then g[a], returns 1 for all three points would mean that:

Code:
101 | 1
110 | 1
111 | 1
And g[b], returns all 0's:

Code:
101 | 0
110 | 0
111 | 0
And g[c], the xor function, would return:

Code:
101 | 0
110 | 0
111 | 1
and g(d), inverse of g(c), would return:

Code:
101 | 1
110 | 1
111 | 0
Or could it be that g[1] means that it will only return a 1 if all points are 1? So:

Code:
101 | 0
110 | 0
111 | 1
and g[b] would have a score of 0, because there are no 000 points.

I'm utterly confused by the question. :/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-07-2012, 02:02 PM
yaser's Avatar
yaser yaser is offline
Caltech
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena, California, USA
Posts: 1,477
Default Re: Confused on question 6.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArikB View Post
I'm confused about how one is supposed to calculate the score exactly. My biggest confusion seems to stem from the misunderstanding of what a 'point' is. Is a point one of the input vectors? so 101, 110 and 111 are 3 points?
A point is a data point, so these are 3 points. For each possible target function, there is a number of agreements (0,1,2 or3) with your hypothesis on these 3 points. We are keeping a tally of the number of agreements as we go through all possible target functions.
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-07-2012, 02:03 PM
ArikB ArikB is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 8
Default Re: Confused on question 6.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaser View Post
A point is a data point, so these are 3 points. For each possible target function, there is a number of agreements (0,1,2 or3) with your hypothesis on these 3 points. We are keeping a tally of the number of agreements as we go through all possible target functions.

Thank you for the response, I was approaching the question completely wrong but solved it in the meantime.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-07-2012, 02:09 PM
yaser's Avatar
yaser yaser is offline
Caltech
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena, California, USA
Posts: 1,477
Default Re: Confused on question 6.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArikB View Post
Thank you for the response, I was approaching the question completely wrong but solved it in the meantime.
You are welcome. Everyone is encouraged to ask questions, big or small.
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-08-2012, 08:46 AM
noahdavis noahdavis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 10
Default Re: Confused on question 6.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaser View Post
A point is a data point, so these are 3 points. For each possible target function, there is a number of agreements (0,1,2 or3) with your hypothesis on these 3 points. We are keeping a tally of the number of agreements as we go through all possible target functions.
Sorry I'm struggling a bit understanding the framework here. Maybe it's just terminology. What is the difference between a "possible target function" and a "hypothesis" ? I thought that they were equivalent, but it does not seem to be the case - a hypothesis must agree with a target function.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-08-2012, 10:31 AM
yaser's Avatar
yaser yaser is offline
Caltech
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Pasadena, California, USA
Posts: 1,477
Default Re: Confused on question 6.

Quote:
Originally Posted by noahdavis View Post
Sorry I'm struggling a bit understanding the framework here. Maybe it's just terminology. What is the difference between a "possible target function" and a "hypothesis" ? I thought that they were equivalent, but it does not seem to be the case - a hypothesis must agree with a target function.
Possible target function is a notion introduced in this problem in order to make a point about learning. In general, there is one target function, albeit unknown. Here we spell out "unkown" by considering all the possibilities the target function can assume. We can afford to do that here because there is only a finite number of possibilities.

Hypotheses are the products of learning that try to approximate the target function. In this problem, we prescribe different learning scenarios that result in different hypotheses, then attempt to grade these hypotheses. We grade them according to how well each of them approximates the target function. The twist is that we consider all possible target functions and grade the hypothesis according to how well it approximates each of these possible targets.
__________________
Where everyone thinks alike, no one thinks very much
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-08-2012, 02:52 PM
noahdavis noahdavis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 10
Default Re: Confused on question 6.

Thank you - I understand now. For some reason it took me a leap to figure out how to build the "target function" such that it could be measured as stated in the problem. Originally, I had a list of 8 "functions" - but each function was just simply one of the 8 permutations where a permutation was an input point and a possible output.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-10-2013, 09:23 AM
kumarpiyush kumarpiyush is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 7
Default Re: Confused on question 6.

Quote:
Originally Posted by noahdavis View Post
Thank you - I understand now. For some reason it took me a leap to figure out how to build the "target function" such that it could be measured as stated in the problem. Originally, I had a list of 8 "functions" - but each function was just simply one of the 8 permutations where a permutation was an input point and a possible output.
Does this mean the combinations of (000) ,(001) upto (111) are the 8 target functions?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-10-2013, 09:25 AM
kumarpiyush kumarpiyush is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 7
Default Re: Confused on question 6.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaser View Post
Possible target function is a notion introduced in this problem in order to make a point about learning. In general, there is one target function, albeit unknown. Here we spell out "unkown" by considering all the possibilities the target function can assume. We can afford to do that here because there is only a finite number of possibilities.

Hypotheses are the products of learning that try to approximate the target function. In this problem, we prescribe different learning scenarios that result in different hypotheses, then attempt to grade these hypotheses. We grade them according to how well each of them approximates the target function. The twist is that we consider all possible target functions and grade the hypothesis according to how well it approximates each of these possible targets.
I understood it now :-)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-10-2013, 02:31 PM
lhamilton lhamilton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2
Default Re: Confused on question 6.

I still don't think I'm interpreting this question correctly.

For 6(d), the function described does not match the data set D.

So, given that, am I correct in thinking that for hypothesis 6(d) there are zero target functions that match the hypothesis?

Because, by definition, a target function must agree with the given data set D. Right?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are to be used ONLY by readers of the Learning From Data book by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa, Malik Magdon-Ismail, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, and participants in the Learning From Data MOOC by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa. No part of these contents is to be communicated or made accessible to ANY other person or entity.