![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* I meant "inner" product above NOT cross product.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scrap what I wrote above about large datasets causing havoc for the weight matrix. I found Octave already knows about such problems and has support for sparse matrices... very useful
![]() |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes, there is a closed form solution which is obtained by taking the
![]() ![]() This is exactly an unscaled linear regression problem where you have rescaled each data point ![]() ![]() Quote:
__________________
Have faith in probability |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Magdon, I always manage to make things so much more complicated than they need to be. That equation you posted would have saved me hours - and it is so simple - why didn't I think of it? Instead I went the long way round, not a total loss though as has been a great learning curve for me
![]() I tried your approach and compared to my workings (in one of my previous posts): ![]() and for all my tests I am getting the same ![]() ![]() Many thanks, I can't say enough how much your help is appreciated. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|