Thread: data snooping
View Single Post
  #2  
Old 11-03-2016, 10:08 AM
CountVonCount CountVonCount is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 17
Default Re: data snooping

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sangrock Lee View Post
Is it data snooping even looingk at training data set? Assume that test data set is completely unknown, Of course.
That is an interesting question and I don't know the exact answer. But I try to give an answer that fits to my understanding.

If you look at the trainings data set you do some "learning" in your mind. Thus you decrease the number of hypothesis dramatically by choosing a hypothesis set that seems to fit to the trainings data.
This means you cannot work with d_{VC} from the reduced hypothesis set to calculate the generalization bound. Instead you need to use a higher d_{VC}, but it is unclear which to use, since you don't know exactly the d_{VC} of the full hypothesis set in your mind before looking at the data.

However if you have not looked at the test-data and keep this data safe until you find the final hypothesis g(x) you can verify your final hypothesis with the test-data. The result is E_{test} and with the Hoeffding-bound you can estimate your E_{out} completely independent of the VC-Dimension value.

Thus my answer is: Yes it is snooping, if you look at the trainings data. Thus you cannot calculate the generalization bound out of the VC-Dimension. But since you have not looked at the test-data you can instead calculate the Hoeffding-bound and the result is a valid estimate for the out-of-sample error.
However keep in mind, that after this calculation your test-data is also compromised and you cannot simply repeat the procedure, if the result is not as expected.
Reply With Quote