Quote:
Originally Posted by sandeeps
In the argument,
After we arrive at the result that
but also state that
it is concluded that H does not shatter the given d+2 points. (I understood this).
However you then stated:
"You cannot shatter your set for any set you choose. Therefore you cannot shatter any set of d+2 points"
How did we go from not shattering a given set of d+2 points to not being to shatter any set of d+2 points?

There were no restrictions on the choice of the
points. The argument started by taking any
points then proving that you cannot shatter them by going through the linearalgebra argument.