Quote:
Originally Posted by magdon
It is simpler to show that if takes on the value in the second part of the min, the condition in (b) is satisfied.

I have difficulties solving this problem. If I assume that
, then the condition in (b)
is not satisfied.
(e.g. when
, then
and
).
I believe the right thing to do would be to assume that
because the min bound will still hold and I believe the condition in (b) is then satisfied? But how do I prove that?
I appreciate any help.