LFD Book Forum (http://book.caltech.edu/bookforum/index.php)
-   Homework 7 (http://book.caltech.edu/bookforum/forumdisplay.php?f=136)
-   -   2 preliminary technicalities on the SVM (http://book.caltech.edu/bookforum/showthread.php?t=4360)

 jjepsuomi 07-08-2013 04:19 AM

2 preliminary technicalities on the SVM

I watched the lecture on support vector machines and most of the lecture I did understand but the part with 2 preliminary technicalities got me totally confused, I didn't really get them. Could someone perhaps explain them to me in simple terms? I have included the part in the lecture where I get confused (lasts about 5 mins):

I have watched that part so many times, but I'm still not getting the two points.

"There has to be a built in it scale-invariance"? :clueless:

"We'll be dividing by something that takes out the factor that does not affect which plane I'm talking about"? :clueless:

Thank you for any help :)

 yaser 07-08-2013 10:10 AM

Re: 2 preliminary technicalities on the SVM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by jjepsuomi (Post 11179) I watched the lecture on support vector machines and most of the lecture I did understand but the part with 2 preliminary technicalities got me totally confused, I didn't really get them. Could someone perhaps explain them to me in simple terms?
I can understand your confusion, as the advantage of these 2 steps is not evident until you go through the rest of the derivation, so they seem somewhat arbitrary when they are presented at the beginning. I'll focus here on the fact that they are "allowed" rather than "useful" since the correctness of the derivation only necessitates that these steps are allowed.

Think of the line defined by the equation (where by definition). This line is the same as since the points that satisfy the first equation are identical to those that satisfy the second, right? You can scale all three parameters in that equation up or down without changing the line that the equation is representing. Therefore, if I require that you scale these coefficients in a particular way, I am allowed to do that. Don't worry about the wisdom of such step, just its correctness. The wisdom appears later on.

By the same token, if I decide to eliminate the notion of and replace it by its value which is the constant 1, and now I call its coefficient in the above equation rather than , I have not changed anything in the essence of the problem that I am solving, so I am allowed to do it.

 jjepsuomi 07-08-2013 11:22 PM

Re: 2 preliminary technicalities on the SVM

Thank you for your reply Professor Mostafa :bow:

Much appreciated!

That helped :)

 All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:24 AM.