![]() |
Minimizing Eaug- where did the 2 go?
Hi,
I think I'm missing something really trivial. In slide 11 of lecture 12, I don't see where the 2 went in differentiating lambda*(w^2). In other words, I feel setting Eaug =>0 should result in a 2*lambda*w term...What am I missing? Thanks. |
Re: Minimizing Eaug- where did the 2 go?
Quote:
|
Re: Minimizing Eaug- where did the 2 go?
Thanks for the quick response. I see it now and should have spotted it. Sorry to have bothered you about this.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are to be used ONLY by readers of the Learning From Data book by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa, Malik Magdon-Ismail, and Hsuan-Tien Lin, and participants in the Learning From Data MOOC by Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa. No part of these contents is to be communicated or made accessible to ANY other person or entity.