questions 5 & 6

Re: questions 5 & 6
...or are we just supposed to use the points generated in order to calculate g_bar? That would mean that bias and var have twice as many points to average over than the number of data sets used to calculate g_bar, because each data set had two two data points.

Re: questions 5 & 6
So to calculate g_bar you used 2 points to get each hypothesis and average over them.
Now Bias and var should come from the entire range of the real line. I would say about hundreds range from 1 to 1. 
Re: questions 5 & 6
Quote:

Re: questions 5 & 6
Quote:

Re: questions 5 & 6
All these are approximating integrals.
Many problems really are sums, but this one is, theoretically, continuous. First you do 2D integrals to compute a, a 1D integral to compute bias, and a 3D integral to compute variance. (I think it would also work to compute bias+variance in the first place, and subtract bias to get variance, but I didn't try that.) I used equally space points for all, but you could also use random points. If I was in the right mood, I might have done Gaussian quadrature, or some other numerical integration method. 
All times are GMT 7. The time now is 04:17 PM. 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000  2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are to be used ONLY by readers of the Learning From Data book by Yaser S. AbuMostafa, Malik MagdonIsmail, and HsuanTien Lin, and participants in the Learning From Data MOOC by Yaser S. AbuMostafa. No part of these contents is to be communicated or made accessible to ANY other person or entity.