Clarification Requested On HighN VC Bound Formula
The instructions at the top of the assignment specify in problems 1 to 3 that for N > Dvc the growth function should be defined as N raised to the Dvc power.
As I understand it that statement directs me to substitute the formula above anywhere the growth function is used in problems 1 to 3 regardless of the dependency on N actually displayed in the problem  2N and N^2 factors are to be ignored. Am I mistaken in this interpretation? Thanks for your attention. 
Re: Clarification Requested On HighN VC Bound Formula
Thanks for the quick response.
So for the case N > Dvc, within any of the formulas that define the various bounds, where there is a growth function reference it should be replaced by N raised to the power Dvc? 
Re: Clarification Requested On HighN VC Bound Formula
Quote:

Re: Clarification Requested On HighN VC Bound Formula
I'm a bit confused by the answer. Before reading the post, I was quite sure about substituting m_{\cal H}(2N) with (2N)^{d_{vc}}, not with (N)^{d_{vc}} for N>d_{vc}. Could you please confirm the former is the correct approximation of the growth function when the argument is 2N? Thank You.

Re: Clarification Requested On HighN VC Bound Formula
Quote:

All times are GMT 7. The time now is 08:03 PM. 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000  2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The contents of this forum are to be used ONLY by readers of the Learning From Data book by Yaser S. AbuMostafa, Malik MagdonIsmail, and HsuanTien Lin, and participants in the Learning From Data MOOC by Yaser S. AbuMostafa. No part of these contents is to be communicated or made accessible to ANY other person or entity.